SuptEval Always free

Run a superintendent evaluation your whole board stands behind.

Your board has exactly one employee. SuptEval guides you from goals and standards through mid-year and summative reviews — evidence gathered, ratings reconciled into one board voice, and the legal compliance handled. Start to signed record.

8
leadership standards
4-point
evidence rubric
One voice
board consensus
app.boardops.org/supt-eval
Dr. Lena Ortiz
Superintendent · Lincoln Public Schools · 2025–26
Mid-year formative
Goals
Self-eval
Mid-year
Summative
Leadership standardsRubric 1–4 · evidence
Vision & strategic leadership
5 indic.
Instructional leadership
7 indic.
Operations & finance
4 indic.
Board overall
3.4/ 4 · Proficient
Sage · open-meeting summary
Board reached consensus on 6 of 8 standards. Draft summary ready for the minutes…

The challenge

One employee. Five to nine board members. No easy way to agree.

The superintendent is the only person a school board directly hires, manages, and reviews. It's the board's most important governance duty — and the one that can easily go sideways. SuptEval gives the board a shared, evidence-based path so the review is fair, defensible, and finished on time.

Hard to agree as a board

Many members, many opinions. Without structure, the loudest voice wins and the rating reflects a mood, not the year.

Easy to drift off the standards

Reviews wander into anecdotes and personalities instead of staying tied to agreed goals and professional standards.

Open Meeting Law risk

Evaluations are public business with strict rules on closed sessions and records. One misstep can void the process.

The process

The evaluation cycle, guided start to finish

Goals at the start, a mid-year check-in, and a year-end review — each conversation has a superintendent side and a board side, with evidence building the whole way.

Throughout the yearEvidence tracking

The superintendent can add evidence to any standard at any time. SuptEval files it automatically — so by review time the record is already there, not reconstructed from memory.

1
Whole board

Set goals & standards

At the start of the year, the board and superintendent agree on goals mapped to the eight standards.

2
Superintendent

Mid-year self-evaluation

Halfway through, the superintendent reflects — rating progress and pointing to the evidence so far.

3
Whole board

Mid-year board review

The board reviews progress together and gives formative feedback to course-correct before year-end.

4
Superintendent

Year-end self-review

At year-end, the superintendent completes a full self-review across all eight standards.

5
Whole board

Year-end board review

Members discuss their thoughts, then reconcile into one summative board rating.

And every review ends right

One board voice

Guided discussion to help reconcile into a single summative score the whole board stands behind.

Signed & sealed

Lock the final evaluation into a tamper-proof, signed PDF for the official district file.

Closed session, documented

Built-in prompts and records to move into and out of closed session legally.

Inside SuptEval

Every part of the review, in one place

Goals that point back to the standards

Set annual goals at the start of the year and link each one to a leadership standard. As evidence comes in, every goal shows live indicators — so by review time, judgments rest on a documented year, not a recent memory.

  • Goals mapped to standards and weighted
  • Evidence indicators attached by any member
  • Progress visible to the whole board
Goals · 2025–26
Raise 3rd-grade reading proficiency
Instr. leadership
6 indicators 3 board notes
Balance the operating budget
Operations
9 indicators 5 board notes

Sage drafts your open-meeting summary

When the board reaches its summative ratings, Sage — BoardOps' AI assistant — drafts a clear, neutral summary suitable for the public minutes as required by the Open Meeting Law. It pulls from the agreed ratings and evidence, so the record reflects the board's decision in plain language.

  • Neutral language ready for the minutes
  • Grounded in the board's own ratings
  • Always editable before it's adopted
SagePublic summary draft
On a 4-point rubric, the Board rated Superintendent Ortiz Proficient (3.4) overall for 2025–26. The Board commended strong gains in instructional leadership and a balanced budget, and identified community engagement as a focus for the year ahead. The evaluation was conducted in closed session per Minn. Stat. § 13D.05.

Two private workspaces, one shared record

The board chair and the superintendent each get a workspace built for their role. The superintendent completes a self-evaluation; the board works through member ratings and consensus. Each side sees what it should, when it should — then both meet in the final, shared record.

  • Role-based access for chair & superintendent
  • Self-evaluation kept private until shared
  • One reconciled record both sides sign
BC
Board chair
Consensus view
Member ratings
Reconciled3.4
LO
Superintendent
Self-evaluation
Self-rating
Vision
Instruction
Private until submitted

Growth across years, not just this one

Each completed evaluation feeds a multi-year view. Boards can see how the superintendent is trending on every standard over time — turning a once-a-year obligation into a real record of professional growth and accountability.

  • Year-over-year ratings per standard
  • Continuity through board turnover
  • Context for contract and compensation talks
Trends · overall rating
2.9
3.1
3.4
2023–242024–252025–26
+0.5 over two years

A tamper-proof record, signed and sealed

When the evaluation is adopted, SuptEval locks it into a signed, immutable PDF — board chair and superintendent signatures, ratings, narrative, and date stamp. It's the official record your district can file and, if ever needed, defend.

  • Locked once adopted — no silent edits
  • Signatures and date stamp embedded
  • Retained for the district file
Official record
Superintendent Evaluation
Lincoln Public Schools · 2025–26
Dr. Lena Ortiz
3.4/ 4 · Proficient
M. Reyes
Board chair
L. Ortiz
Superintendent
Locked & signed · Jun 9, 2026

The framework

Eight leadership standards, one four-point rubric

Every rating ties to the same research-based standards and the same plain-language rubric — so the whole board is judging the same thing, the same way.

Vision & strategy

Direction, planning, and shared goals.

Instructional leadership

Teaching, learning, and student outcomes.

Operations & finance

Budget, facilities, and stewardship.

Communication

Transparency with staff and public.

Community & board relations

Partnership with the board and community.

Human resources

Hiring, development, and culture.

Equity & culture

Access and belonging for every student.

Ethics & integrity

Trust, judgment, and accountability.

The rubric
Four points, clearly defined
1 · Beginning
Developing core practice
2 · Developing
Progressing toward proficient
3 · Proficient
Meets the standard well
4 · Distinguished
A model for others

Built-in compliance

The legal parts, handled

A superintendent evaluation is public business. SuptEval bakes Minnesota's requirements into the workflow — so the board can focus on the review, not the statutes.

Go to SuptEval

Closing the meeting

Step-by-step prompts to move into and out of closed session correctly.

Open Meeting Law

Aligned with Minn. Stat. § 13D.05 for evaluation sessions.

Data practices

Handles what's public and what's private under the MGDPA.

Records retention

The signed evaluation is preserved for the official file.

Always free

Give your one employee a review that holds up.

SuptEval is part of BoardOps and free for every district — no contracts, no per-seat pricing. Set up your board and start this year's evaluation today.